valid arguments on both sides双方都有有效的论据
There are valid arguments on both sides.
a waste of public resources浪费公共资源
be allocated to more important issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure分配给更重要的问题,如医疗、教育和基础设施
Some people believe that government funding for the arts is a waste of public resources and that money should be allocated to more important issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
does not provide significant benefits to society没有给社会带来显著的好处
should regulate the arts应该规范艺术
They argue that supporting artists does not provide significant benefits to society and that the market should regulate the arts.
crucial elements of a healthy and thriving society是健康和繁荣社会的关键因素
On the other hand, supporters of government funding for the arts argue that art and culture are crucial elements of a healthy and thriving society.
inspire and influence people激励和影响他人
provoke thought引发思考
bring communities together让社区团结起来
They argue that art can inspire and influence people, provoke thought, and bring communities together.
provide economic benefits by creating jobs, attracting tourists, and generating revenue通过创造就业机会、吸引游客和创造收入来提供经济效益
Additionally, they claim that government funding for the arts can provide economic benefits by creating jobs, attracting tourists, and generating revenue.
consider the value of art and culture in society考虑艺术和文化在社会中的价值
In conclusion, while both arguments have merit, it is important to consider the value of art and culture in society.
may not be the most pressing issue也许不是最紧迫的问题
maintain and support creative expression in all forms维护和支持各种形式的创造性表达
While government funding for the arts may not be the most pressing issue, it is important to maintain and support creative expression in all forms.